Skepticism and Freedom: A Modern Case for Classical Liberalism (Studies in Law and Economics)

Many Of The Modern Attacks On The Classical Liberal System Seek To Undermine The Moral, Conceptual, Cognitive, And Psychological Foundations On Which It Rests. Epstein Rises To This Challenge By Carefully Rebutting Each Of These Objections In Turn. For Instance, Epstein Demonstrates How Our Inability To Judge The Preferences Of Others Means We Should Respect Their Liberty Of Choice Regarding Their Own Lives. And He Points Out The Flaws In Behavioral Economic Arguments Which, Overlooking Strong Evolutionary Pressures, Claim That Individual Preferences Are Unstable And That People Are Unable To Adopt Rational Means To Achieve Their Own Ends. Freedom, Epstein Ultimately Shows, Depends Upon A Skepticism That Rightly Shuns Making Judgments About What Is Best For Individuals, But That Also Avoids The Relativistic Traps That All Judgments About Our Political Institutions Have Equal Worth.--jacket. Two Forms Of Skepticism -- The System Of Liberty -- Moral Relativism -- Moral Incrementalism -- Conceptual Skepticism -- A Preference For Preferences -- Metapreferences, Relative Preferences, And The Prisoner's Dilemma Game -- Behavioral Anomalies -- Cognitive Biases. Richard A. Epstein. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 265-293) And Index.